↓ Skip to main content

Photonic crystals cause active colour change in chameleons

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
917 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1249 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Photonic crystals cause active colour change in chameleons
Published in
Nature Communications, March 2015
DOI 10.1038/ncomms7368
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jérémie Teyssier, Suzanne V. Saenko, Dirk van der Marel, Michel C. Milinkovitch

Abstract

Many chameleons, and panther chameleons in particular, have the remarkable ability to exhibit complex and rapid colour changes during social interactions such as male contests or courtship. It is generally interpreted that these changes are due to dispersion/aggregation of pigment-containing organelles within dermal chromatophores. Here, combining microscopy, photometric videography and photonic band-gap modelling, we show that chameleons shift colour through active tuning of a lattice of guanine nanocrystals within a superficial thick layer of dermal iridophores. In addition, we show that a deeper population of iridophores with larger crystals reflects a substantial proportion of sunlight especially in the near-infrared range. The organization of iridophores into two superposed layers constitutes an evolutionary novelty for chameleons, which allows some species to combine efficient camouflage with spectacular display, while potentially providing passive thermal protection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 682 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 17 1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Other 12 <1%
Unknown 1201 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 266 21%
Student > Bachelor 195 16%
Researcher 165 13%
Student > Master 158 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 62 5%
Other 163 13%
Unknown 240 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 203 16%
Physics and Astronomy 144 12%
Chemistry 144 12%
Materials Science 136 11%
Engineering 135 11%
Other 215 17%
Unknown 272 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1480. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,172
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#164
of 58,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62
of 275,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1
of 770 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 770 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.