↓ Skip to main content

Meaning and challenges in the practice of multiple therapeutic massage modalities: a combined methods study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Meaning and challenges in the practice of multiple therapeutic massage modalities: a combined methods study
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-11-75
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antony J Porcino, Heather S Boon, Stacey A Page, Marja J Verhoef

Abstract

Therapeutic massage and bodywork (TMB) practitioners are predominantly trained in programs that are not uniformly standardized, and in variable combinations of therapies. To date no studies have explored this variability in training and how this affects clinical practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 42 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 18%
Researcher 7 16%
Other 4 9%
Lecturer 3 7%
Professor 2 4%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Engineering 3 7%
Sports and Recreations 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 12 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2012.
All research outputs
#4,428,736
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#827
of 3,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,723
of 130,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#19
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.