↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase (FAAH) Inhibitors in Non-Human Primate Models of Nicotine Reward and Relapse

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychopharmacology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase (FAAH) Inhibitors in Non-Human Primate Models of Nicotine Reward and Relapse
Published in
Neuropsychopharmacology, March 2015
DOI 10.1038/npp.2015.62
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zuzana Justinova, Leigh V Panlilio, Guillermo Moreno-Sanz, Godfrey H Redhi, Alessia Auber, Maria E Secci, Paola Mascia, Tiziano Bandiera, Andrea Armirotti, Rosalia Bertorelli, Svetlana I Chefer, Chanel Barnes, Sevil Yasar, Daniele Piomelli, Steven R Goldberg

Abstract

Inhibition of the enzyme fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) counteracts reward-related effects of nicotine in rats, but has not been tested for this purpose in non-human primates. Therefore, we studied the effects of the first- and second-generation O-arylcarbamate-based FAAH inhibitors, URB597 (cyclohexyl carbamic acid 3'-carbamoyl-3-yl ester) and URB694 (6-hydroxy-[1,1'-biphenyl]-3-yl-cyclohexylcarbamate), in squirrel monkeys. Both FAAH inhibitors: 1) blocked FAAH activity in brain and liver, increasing levels of endogenous ligands for cannabinoid and alpha-type peroxisome proliferator-activated (PPAR-α) receptors; 2) shifted nicotine self-administration dose-response functions in a manner consistent with reduced nicotine reward; 3) blocked reinstatement of nicotine seeking induced by re-exposure to either nicotine priming or nicotine-associated cues; and 4) had no effect on cocaine or food self-administration. The effects of FAAH inhibition on nicotine self-administration and nicotine priming-induced reinstatement were reversed by the PPAR-α antagonist, MK886. Unlike URB597, which was not self-administered by monkeys in an earlier study, URB694 was self-administered at a moderate rate. URB694 self-administration was blocked by pretreatment with an antagonist for either PPAR-α (MK886) or cannabinoid CB1 receptors (rimonabant). In additional experiments in rats, URB694 was devoid of THC-like or nicotine-like interoceptive effects under drug-discrimination procedures, and neither FAAH inhibitor induced dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens shell-consistent with their lack of robust reinforcing effects in monkeys. Overall, both URB597 and URB694 show promise for the initialization and maintenance of smoking cessation, due to their ability to block the rewarding effects of nicotine and prevent nicotine priming-induced and cue-induced reinstatement.Neuropsychopharmacology accepted article preview online, 10 March 2015. doi:10.1038/npp.2015.62.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 71 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Master 9 12%
Researcher 8 11%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 19 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 14%
Neuroscience 7 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 9%
Psychology 7 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 7%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 23 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2017.
All research outputs
#2,770,709
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychopharmacology
#1,365
of 4,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,679
of 258,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychopharmacology
#46
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.