↓ Skip to main content

Circulating antigen tests and urine reagent strips for diagnosis of active schistosomiasis in endemic areas

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
343 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Circulating antigen tests and urine reagent strips for diagnosis of active schistosomiasis in endemic areas
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009579.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eleanor A Ochodo, Gowri Gopalakrishna, Bea Spek, Johannes B Reitsma, Lisette van Lieshout, Katja Polman, Poppy Lamberton, Patrick MM Bossuyt, Mariska MG Leeflang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 343 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 339 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 12%
Researcher 40 12%
Student > Bachelor 35 10%
Student > Postgraduate 21 6%
Other 62 18%
Unknown 88 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 104 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 4%
Other 44 13%
Unknown 107 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2020.
All research outputs
#717,942
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,338
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,737
of 275,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.