↓ Skip to main content

Circulating antigen tests and urine reagent strips for diagnosis of active schistosomiasis in endemic areas

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
11 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Circulating antigen tests and urine reagent strips for diagnosis of active schistosomiasis in endemic areas
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009579.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ochodo EA, Gopalakrishna G, Spek B, Reitsma JB, van Lieshout L, Polman K, Lamberton P, Bossuyt PM, Leeflang MM, Ochodo, Eleanor A, Gopalakrishna, Gowri, Spek, Bea, Reitsma, Johannes B, van Lieshout, Lisette, Polman, Katja, Lamberton, Poppy, Bossuyt, Patrick MM, Leeflang, Mariska MG

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Gambia 1 <1%
Unknown 145 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 18%
Researcher 22 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Unspecified 14 9%
Other 38 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 34%
Unspecified 23 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Other 33 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2016.
All research outputs
#250,012
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#388
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,145
of 222,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.