↓ Skip to main content

Long-Term Effect of Population Screening for Diabetes on Cardiovascular Morbidity, Self-Rated Health, and Health Behavior

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Family Medicine, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
30 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long-Term Effect of Population Screening for Diabetes on Cardiovascular Morbidity, Self-Rated Health, and Health Behavior
Published in
Annals of Family Medicine, March 2015
DOI 10.1370/afm.1737
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. B. Echouffo-Tcheugui, R. K. Simmons, A. T. Prevost, K. M. Williams, A.-L. Kinmonth, N. J. Wareham, S. J. Griffin

Abstract

There is limited trial evidence concerning the long-term effects of screening for type 2 diabetes on population morbidity. We examined the effect of a population-based diabetes screening program on cardiovascular morbidity, self-rated health, and health-related behaviors.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 91 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 18%
Student > Master 16 17%
Unspecified 14 15%
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Other 20 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 38%
Unspecified 17 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Psychology 6 6%
Other 21 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2018.
All research outputs
#381,843
of 13,611,214 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Family Medicine
#213
of 1,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,332
of 215,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Family Medicine
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,611,214 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.