You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Long-Term Effect of Population Screening for Diabetes on Cardiovascular Morbidity, Self-Rated Health, and Health Behavior
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Family Medicine, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1370/afm.1737 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Justin B. Echouffo-Tcheugui, Rebecca K. Simmons, A. Toby Prevost, Kate M. Williams, Ann-Louise Kinmonth, Nicholas J. Wareham, Simon J. Griffin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 3 | 11% |
| Canada | 3 | 11% |
| Chile | 2 | 7% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Japan | 2 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 165 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 15% |
| Researcher | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 14% |
| Unknown | 46 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 9% |
| Psychology | 10 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 15% |
| Unknown | 53 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2021.
All research outputs
#809,446
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Family Medicine
#333
of 1,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,004
of 274,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Family Medicine
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,938 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.