↓ Skip to main content

Not all forms of collaborative care are the same.

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Not all forms of collaborative care are the same.
Published in
British Medical Journal, January 2015
DOI 10.1136/bmj.h1287
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Sharpe

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 50%
Librarian 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 1 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2015.
All research outputs
#4,386,862
of 5,269,182 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#25,319
of 26,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,856
of 154,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#846
of 850 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,269,182 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 850 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.