↓ Skip to main content

A Pilot Study Examining Diagnostic Differences Among Exercise and Weight Suppression in Bulimia Nervosa and Binge Eating Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in European Eating Disorders Review, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Pilot Study Examining Diagnostic Differences Among Exercise and Weight Suppression in Bulimia Nervosa and Binge Eating Disorder
Published in
European Eating Disorders Review, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/erv.2350
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian J Cook, Kristine J Steffen, James E Mitchell, Maxwell Otto, Ross D Crosby, Li Cao, Stephen A Wonderlich, Scott Crow, Laura Hill, Daniel Le Grange, Pauline Powers, Cook, Brian J., Steffen, Kristine J., Mitchell, James E., Otto, Maxwell, Crosby, Ross D., Cao, Li, Wonderlich, Stephen A., Crow, Scott, Hill, Laura, Le Grange, Daniel, Powers, Pauline

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate diagnostic differences in weight suppression (e.g., the difference between one's current body weight and highest non-pregnancy adult body weight) and exercise among Bulimia Nervosa (BN) and Binge Eating Disorder (BED). Because exercise may be a key contributor to weight suppression in BN, we were interested in examining the potential moderating effect of exercise on weight suppression in BN or BED.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 37%
Student > Master 5 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 21%
Professor 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 37%
Psychology 6 32%
Social Sciences 2 11%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 2 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2015.
All research outputs
#1,357,176
of 6,356,958 outputs
Outputs from European Eating Disorders Review
#109
of 355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,390
of 163,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Eating Disorders Review
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,356,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 355 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.