↓ Skip to main content

Air pollution and children's health: sickle cell disease.

Overview of attention for article published in Cadernos de saúde pública, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Air pollution and children's health: sickle cell disease.
Published in
Cadernos de saúde pública, February 2015
DOI 10.1590/0102-311x00013214
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silvia Maria de Macedo Barbosa, Sylvia Costa Lima Farhat, Lourdes Conceição Martins, Luiz Alberto Amador Pereira, Paulo Hilário Nascimento Saldiva, Antonella Zanobetti, Alfésio Luís Ferreira Braga, Barbosa SM, Farhat SC, Martins LC, Pereira LA, Saldiva PH, Zanobetti A, Braga AL

Abstract

The hallmarks of sickle cell disease are anemia and vasculopathy. The aim of this study was to assess the association between air pollution and children's emergency room visits of sickle cell patients. We adopted a case-crossover design. Daily counts of children's and adolescents' sickle cell disease emergency room visits from the pediatric emergency unit in São Paulo, Brazil, were evaluated from September 1999 to December 2004, matching by temperature, humidity and controlling for day of the week. Interquartile range increases of the four-day moving averages of PM10, NO2, SO2, CO, and O3 were associated with increases of 18.9% (95%CI: 11.2-26.5), 19% (95%CI: 8.3-29.6), 14.4% (95%CI: 6.5-22.4), 16,5% (95%CI: 8.9-24.0), and 9.8% (95%CI: 1.1-18.6) in total sickle cell emergency room visits, respectively. When the analyses were stratified by pain, PM10 was found to be 40.3% higher than in sickle cell patients without pain symptoms. Exposure to air pollution can affect the cardiovascular health of children and may promote a significant health burden in a sensitive group.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 2%
Unknown 38 93%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Unknown 38 93%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2016.
All research outputs
#13,429,828
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de saúde pública
#3
of 26 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,814
of 352,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de saúde pública
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.9. This one scored the same or higher as 23 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them