You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficacy of pastes containing CPP-ACP and CPP-ACFP in patients with Sjögren’s syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Oral Investigations, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00784-015-1444-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tamara Peric, Dejan Markovic, Bojan Petrovic, Vesna Radojevic, Tatjana Todorovic, Biljana Andjelski Radicevic, Radmila Jancic Heinemann, Gordana Susic, Aleksandra Peric Popadic, Vesna Tomic Spiric |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| India | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Serbia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 86 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 34 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 43% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 35 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2015.
All research outputs
#14,805,023
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Oral Investigations
#563
of 1,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,645
of 260,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Oral Investigations
#9
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,401 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.