You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hypersensitivity to non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs): classification of a Danish patient cohort according to EAACI/ENDA guidelines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical and Translational Allergy, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13601-015-0052-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christoffer V Nissen, Carsten Bindslev-Jensen, Charlotte G Mortz |
| Abstract |
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are reported to be the second most common cause of drug hypersensitivity. In 2011, experts from the EAACI/ENDA group and GA(2)LEN proposed a new classification system for NSAID hypersensitivity. The aim of this study was to classify a patient cohort with a history of NSAID hypersensitivity according to this system. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Romania | 2 | 25% |
| Austria | 1 | 13% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 11 | 19% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Unknown | 13 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 41% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 15 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,302,619
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#393
of 756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,527
of 271,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#9
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.