↓ Skip to main content

Paracetamol (acetaminophen) for patent ductus arteriosus in preterm or low-birth-weight infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Paracetamol (acetaminophen) for patent ductus arteriosus in preterm or low-birth-weight infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010061.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arne Ohlsson, Prakeshkumar S Shah

Abstract

In preterm newborns, the ductus arteriosus frequently fails to close and the infants require medical or surgical closure of the patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). A PDA can be treated surgically or medically with one of two prostaglandin inhibitors, indomethacin or ibuprofen. Case reports suggest that paracetamol may be an alternative for the closure of a PDA. Concerns have been raised that in neonatal mice paracetamol may cause adverse effects on the developing brain, and an association between prenatal exposure to paracetamol and later development of autism or autism spectrum disorder has been reported.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 147 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 16%
Student > Master 23 15%
Researcher 22 15%
Student > Postgraduate 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Other 31 21%
Unknown 19 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 11%
Psychology 10 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 30 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2016.
All research outputs
#3,328,498
of 13,347,352 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,073
of 10,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,836
of 216,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#160
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,347,352 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.