↓ Skip to main content

Bibliometric analysis of ethnobotanical research in Brazil (1988-2013)

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Botanica Brasilica, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bibliometric analysis of ethnobotanical research in Brazil (1988-2013)
Published in
Acta Botanica Brasilica, March 2015
DOI 10.1590/0102-33062014abb3524
Authors

Mara Rejane Ritter, Taline Cristina da Silva, Elcida de Lima Araújo, Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 4%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 73 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Researcher 5 6%
Other 21 27%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 35%
Environmental Science 13 17%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 17 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2015.
All research outputs
#3,446,250
of 4,869,893 outputs
Outputs from Acta Botanica Brasilica
#20
of 28 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,434
of 146,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Botanica Brasilica
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,869,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one scored the same or higher as 8 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them