↓ Skip to main content

Recommendations for a Core Outcome Set for Measuring Standing Balance in Adult Populations: A Consensus-Based Approach

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
twitter
25 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recommendations for a Core Outcome Set for Measuring Standing Balance in Adult Populations: A Consensus-Based Approach
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2015
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0120568
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn M. Sibley, Tracey Howe, Sarah E. Lamb, Stephen R. Lord, Brian E. Maki, Debra J. Rose, Vicky Scott, Liza Stathokostas, Sharon E. Straus, Susan B. Jaglal

Abstract

Standing balance is imperative for mobility and avoiding falls. Use of an excessive number of standing balance measures has limited the synthesis of balance intervention data and hampered consistent clinical practice.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 127 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 17%
Student > Bachelor 20 16%
Student > Master 15 12%
Researcher 14 11%
Professor 9 7%
Other 30 23%
Unknown 18 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 31 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 20%
Sports and Recreations 14 11%
Engineering 7 5%
Neuroscience 6 5%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 29 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2021.
All research outputs
#263,682
of 17,464,602 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#4,373
of 165,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,158
of 223,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#119
of 4,316 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,464,602 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 165,311 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,316 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.