↓ Skip to main content

Recommendations for a Core Outcome Set for Measuring Standing Balance in Adult Populations: A Consensus-Based Approach

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS ONE, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recommendations for a Core Outcome Set for Measuring Standing Balance in Adult Populations: A Consensus-Based Approach
Published in
PLoS ONE, March 2015
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0120568
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn M. Sibley, Tracey Howe, Sarah E. Lamb, Stephen R. Lord, Brian E. Maki, Debra J. Rose, Vicky Scott, Liza Stathokostas, Sharon E. Straus, Susan B. Jaglal

Abstract

Standing balance is imperative for mobility and avoiding falls. Use of an excessive number of standing balance measures has limited the synthesis of balance intervention data and hampered consistent clinical practice.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 83 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 20%
Student > Bachelor 15 18%
Student > Master 11 13%
Researcher 9 11%
Unspecified 7 8%
Other 24 29%
Unknown 1 1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 25%
Sports and Recreations 13 15%
Unspecified 11 13%
Engineering 6 7%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 1 1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2019.
All research outputs
#813,370
of 12,920,212 outputs
Outputs from PLoS ONE
#14,142
of 139,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,459
of 216,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS ONE
#449
of 4,311 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,920,212 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 139,851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,311 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.