↓ Skip to main content

Recommendations for a Core Outcome Set for Measuring Standing Balance in Adult Populations: A Consensus-Based Approach

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS ONE, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recommendations for a Core Outcome Set for Measuring Standing Balance in Adult Populations: A Consensus-Based Approach
Published in
PLoS ONE, March 2015
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0120568
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn M. Sibley, Tracey Howe, Sarah E. Lamb, Stephen R. Lord, Brian E. Maki, Debra J. Rose, Vicky Scott, Liza Stathokostas, Sharon E. Straus, Susan B. Jaglal

Abstract

Standing balance is imperative for mobility and avoiding falls. Use of an excessive number of standing balance measures has limited the synthesis of balance intervention data and hampered consistent clinical practice.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 94 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Student > Master 13 14%
Researcher 10 11%
Unspecified 7 7%
Other 30 32%
Unknown 1 1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 27 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 24%
Unspecified 13 14%
Sports and Recreations 13 14%
Engineering 6 6%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 1 1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2019.
All research outputs
#874,438
of 13,343,384 outputs
Outputs from PLoS ONE
#14,807
of 142,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,897
of 216,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS ONE
#467
of 4,311 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,343,384 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,414 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,311 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.