↓ Skip to main content

Golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) habitat selection as a function of land use and terrain, San Diego County, California

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) habitat selection as a function of land use and terrain, San Diego County, California
Published in
US Geological Survey, January 2018
DOI 10.3133/ofr20181067
Authors

Tracey, Jeff A., Madden, Melanie C., Bloom, Peter H., Katzner, Todd E., Fisher, Robert N.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 50%
Other 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2018.
All research outputs
#10,233,182
of 12,818,993 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#1,258
of 1,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,795
of 270,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#85
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,818,993 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.