↓ Skip to main content

Coseismic fault zone deformation revealed with differential lidar: Examples from Japanese Mw ∼7 intraplate earthquakes

Overview of attention for article published in Earth & Planetary Science Letters, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Coseismic fault zone deformation revealed with differential lidar: Examples from Japanese Mw ∼7 intraplate earthquakes
Published in
Earth & Planetary Science Letters, November 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.08.031
Authors

Edwin Nissen, Tadashi Maruyama, J Ramon Arrowsmith, John R. Elliott, Aravindhan K. Krishnan, Michael E. Oskin, Srikanth Saripalli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 102 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 30%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 16 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 61 58%
Engineering 10 10%
Environmental Science 8 8%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 20 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,401,093
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#966
of 5,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,343
of 273,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#18
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.