↓ Skip to main content

Estimated dietary dioxin exposure and breast cancer risk among women from the French E3N prospective cohort

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estimated dietary dioxin exposure and breast cancer risk among women from the French E3N prospective cohort
Published in
Breast Cancer Research, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13058-015-0536-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aurélie MN Danjou, Béatrice Fervers, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Thierry Philip, Françoise Clavel-Chapelon, Laure Dossus

Abstract

Dioxins are environmental and persistent pollutants mostly emitted from combustion facilities (e.g. waste incinerators, metal and cement industries). Known to be endocrine disrupting chemicals, dioxins are suspected to increase breast cancer (BC) risk. Although diet is considered the primary source of dioxin exposure, no previous study has been published on dietary dioxin exposure in relation to BC risk. We aimed to assess dietary dioxin exposure among women from the E3N cohort and estimate BC risk associated with this exposure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Unknown 50 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 18 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 22 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2015.
All research outputs
#633,726
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#53
of 1,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,434
of 286,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#3
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.