You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exercise barriers self-efficacy: development and validation of a subcale for individuals with cancer-related lymphedema
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12955-015-0223-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jena Buchan, Monika Janda, Robyn Box, Laura Rogers, Sandi Hayes |
| Abstract |
No tool exists to measure self-efficacy for overcoming lymphedema-related exercise barriers in individuals with cancer-related lymphedema. However, an existing scale measures confidence to overcome general exercise barriers in cancer survivors. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop, validate and assess the reliability of a subscale, to be used in conjunction with the general barriers scale, for determining exercise barriers self-efficacy in individuals facing lymphedema-related exercise barriers. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 26 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 19% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 8% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 29 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2015.
All research outputs
#6,099,099
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#705
of 2,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,653
of 353,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#4
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.