↓ Skip to main content

Debridement of diabetic foot ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Debridement of diabetic foot ulcers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003556.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jude Edwards, Sally Stapley

Abstract

Foot ulceration is thought to affect 15% of people with diabetes at some time in their lives. Debridement is widely regarded as an effective intervention to speed up ulcer healing. The most effective method is unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 198 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 37 18%
Student > Master 33 16%
Researcher 29 14%
Student > Postgraduate 19 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 9%
Other 54 26%
Unknown 18 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 100 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 7%
Chemistry 5 2%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 27 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2016.
All research outputs
#1,726,166
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,306
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,993
of 97,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.