↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of crown-root angulation of lateral incisors adjacent to palatally impacted canines

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Orthodontics, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of crown-root angulation of lateral incisors adjacent to palatally impacted canines
Published in
Progress in Orthodontics, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40510-015-0074-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Georgios Kanavakis, Karen M Curran, Kevin C Wiseman, Nicholas P Barone, Matthew D Finkelman, Sreedevi Srinivasan, Moonyoung B Lee, Caroll-Ann Trotman

Abstract

The objective of this study is to explore differences in crown-to-root angulation between lateral incisors adjacent to palatally impacted canines (PICs) and lateral incisors adjacent to normally erupted canines (NECs).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 28%
Student > Postgraduate 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Librarian 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 62%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 4 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2015.
All research outputs
#3,263,938
of 4,888,368 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Orthodontics
#53
of 79 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,281
of 152,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Orthodontics
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,888,368 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.