You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Disparate voxel based morphometry (VBM) results between SPM and FSL softwares in ALS patients with frontotemporal dementia: which VBM results to consider?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Neurology, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12883-015-0274-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Venkateswaran Rajagopalan, Erik P Pioro |
| Abstract |
Because our previous study showed disparate voxel based morphometry (VBM) results between SPM and FSL softwares in the brain of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients with frontotemporal dementia (ALS-FTD), we investigated which VBM results may more represent atrophy by comparing with Freesurfer's cortical volume and thickness measures. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Germany | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 102 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 24% |
| Researcher | 21 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 16% |
| Unknown | 16 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 27 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 17% |
| Psychology | 17 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Engineering | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 21 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,771,751
of 25,018,122 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#142
of 2,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,268
of 266,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#3
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,018,122 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.