You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mood Disorders in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Results From an International Inception Cohort Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arthritis & Rheumatology, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/art.39111 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John G Hanly, Li Su, Murray B Urowitz, Juanita Romero-Diaz, Caroline Gordon, Sang-Cheol Bae, Sasha Bernatsky, Ann E Clarke, Daniel J Wallace, Joan T Merrill, David A Isenberg, Anisur Rahman, Ellen M Ginzler, Michelle Petri, Ian N Bruce, M A Dooley, Paul Fortin, Dafna D Gladman, Jorge Sanchez-Guerrero, Kristjan Steinsson, Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman, Munther A Khamashta, Cynthia Aranow, Graciela S Alarcón, Barri J Fessler, Susan Manzi, Ola Nived, Gunnar K Sturfelt, Asad A Zoma, Ronald F van Vollenhoven, Manuel Ramos-Casals, Guillermo Ruiz-Irastorza, S Sam Lim, Kenneth C Kalunian, Murat Inanc, Diane L Kamen, Christine A Peschken, Soren Jacobsen, Anca Askanase, Chris Theriault, Kara Thompson, Vernon Farewell |
| Abstract |
To determine the frequency, clinical and autoantibody associations and outcome of mood disorders in a multi-ethnic/racial, prospective, inception cohort of SLE patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 148 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 12% |
| Researcher | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 19% |
| Unknown | 42 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 37% |
| Psychology | 12 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 53 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2015.
All research outputs
#2,019,236
of 24,477,448 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis & Rheumatology
#720
of 2,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,300
of 268,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis & Rheumatology
#15
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,477,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.