↓ Skip to main content

Mood Disorders in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Results From an International Inception Cohort Study

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis & Rheumatology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mood Disorders in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Results From an International Inception Cohort Study
Published in
Arthritis & Rheumatology, June 2015
DOI 10.1002/art.39111
Pubmed ID
Authors

John G. Hanly, Li Su, Murray B. Urowitz, Juanita Romero-Diaz, Caroline Gordon, Sang-Cheol Bae, Sasha Bernatsky, Ann E. Clarke, Daniel J. Wallace, Joan T. Merrill, David A. Isenberg, Anisur Rahman, Ellen M. Ginzler, Michelle Petri, Ian N. Bruce, M. A. Dooley, Paul Fortin, Dafna D. Gladman, Jorge Sanchez-Guerrero, Kristjan Steinsson, Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman, Munther A. Khamashta, Cynthia Aranow, Graciela S. Alarcón, Barri J. Fessler, Susan Manzi, Ola Nived, Gunnar K. Sturfelt, Asad A. Zoma, Ronald F. van Vollenhoven, Manuel Ramos-Casals, Guillermo Ruiz-Irastorza, S. Sam Lim, Kenneth C. Kalunian, Murat Inanc, Diane L. Kamen, Christine A. Peschken, Soren Jacobsen, Anca Askanase, Chris Theriault, Kara Thompson, Vernon Farewell

Abstract

To determine the frequency, clinical and autoantibody associations and outcome of mood disorders in a multi-ethnic/racial, prospective, inception cohort of SLE patients.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Taiwan 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 72 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 12 16%
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Other 26 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 47%
Unspecified 17 22%
Psychology 7 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 10 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2015.
All research outputs
#807,503
of 12,532,141 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis & Rheumatology
#179
of 911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,887
of 219,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis & Rheumatology
#19
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,532,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 911 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.