↓ Skip to main content

Interspecific and Geographic Variation in the Diets of Sympatric Carnivores: Dingoes/Wild Dogs and Red Foxes in South-Eastern Australia

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
90 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interspecific and Geographic Variation in the Diets of Sympatric Carnivores: Dingoes/Wild Dogs and Red Foxes in South-Eastern Australia
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2015
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0120975
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naomi E. Davis, David M. Forsyth, Barbara Triggs, Charlie Pascoe, Joe Benshemesh, Alan Robley, Jenny Lawrence, Euan G. Ritchie, Dale G. Nimmo, Lindy F. Lumsden

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Unknown 111 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 21%
Student > Master 22 19%
Student > Bachelor 17 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 15%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 10 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 47%
Environmental Science 25 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 4%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 13 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2021.
All research outputs
#315,867
of 17,508,799 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#5,192
of 165,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,212
of 230,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#139
of 4,496 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,508,799 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 165,449 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,496 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.