↓ Skip to main content

The Polish face in profile: a cephalometric baseline study

Overview of attention for article published in Head & Face Medicine, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Polish face in profile: a cephalometric baseline study
Published in
Head & Face Medicine, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13005-015-0065-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jolanta E Loster, Stephen Williams, Aneta Wieczorek, Bartłomiej W Loster

Abstract

This study reports the cephalometric evaluation of a group of adolescent Polish individuals describing dento-facial structure as well as details of incisor position and soft tissue characteristics. The results should reveal morphological features specific to Polish persons and serve as a comparative material for future diagnostic procedures. The study was based on an analysis of cephalgrams of 122 Polish adolescents average age 18years 6 months analysed in a computer system using the Kracovia composite system analysis describing dento facial morphology ad modum Björk as well as soft tissue factors. The control material was based on published reports by Björk (Dento-facial characteristics) Riketts and Holdaway (soft tissue profile). The comparative study revealed a slight reduction in the sagittal jaw relationship with a significant reduction in the vertical jaw relationship and a distinctive mandibular morphology with a reduced jaw angle and an increase in the Beta angle. These findings were reflected in the soft tissue pattern. The soft tissue profile reflected the skeletal cephalometrics observation. Concerning correlation related to the sagittal jaw relationship the findings of the present study indicate that a large degree of agreement with the morphology and orientation of the mandible being the most important factor.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 16%
Student > Postgraduate 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Other 3 8%
Lecturer 3 8%
Other 12 32%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 62%
Unspecified 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2023.
All research outputs
#15,670,410
of 24,820,264 outputs
Outputs from Head & Face Medicine
#104
of 343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,170
of 268,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Head & Face Medicine
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,820,264 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 343 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.