↓ Skip to main content

Endoscopic or surgical intervention for painful obstructive chronic pancreatitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Endoscopic or surgical intervention for painful obstructive chronic pancreatitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007884.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Usama Ahmed Ali, Johanna M Pahlplatz, Wiliam H Nealon, Harry van Goor, Hein G Gooszen, Marja A Boermeester

Abstract

Endoscopy and surgery are the treatment modalities of choice for patients with chronic pancreatitis and dilated pancreatic duct (obstructive chronic pancreatitis). Physicians face, without clear consensus, the choice between endoscopy or surgery for this group of patients.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Unknown 91 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 16%
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Other 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Psychology 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 25 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2018.
All research outputs
#3,880,846
of 13,465,538 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,869
of 10,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,007
of 221,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#175
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,465,538 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,607 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.