You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Breakfast Skipping is Positively Associated With Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Evidence From the Aichi Workers’ Cohort Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Epidemiology, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2188/jea.je20140109 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mayu Uemura, Hiroshi Yatsuya, Esayas Haregot Hilawe, Yuanying Li, Chaochen Wang, Chifa Chiang, Rei Otsuka, Hideaki Toyoshima, Koji Tamakoshi, Atsuko Aoyama |
| Abstract |
Skipping breakfast has been suspected as a risk factor for type 2 diabetes (T2DM), but the associations are not entirely consistent across ethnicities or sexes, and the issue has not been adequately addressed in the Japanese population. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| South Africa | 1 | 6% |
| Argentina | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 135 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
| Researcher | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 16% |
| Unknown | 44 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 51 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,201,250
of 25,726,194 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Epidemiology
#62
of 929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,983
of 278,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Epidemiology
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,726,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.