You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Coordinated international action to accelerate genome-to-phenome with FAANG, the Functional Annotation of Animal Genomes project
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-015-0622-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
The FAANG Consortium, Leif Andersson, Alan L Archibald, Cynthia D Bottema, Rudiger Brauning, Shane C Burgess, Dave W Burt, Eduardo Casas, Hans H Cheng, Laura Clarke, Christine Couldrey, Brian P Dalrymple, Christine G Elsik, Sylvain Foissac, Elisabetta Giuffra, Martien A Groenen, Ben J Hayes, LuSheng S Huang, Hassan Khatib, James W Kijas, Heebal Kim, Joan K Lunney, Fiona M McCarthy, John C McEwan, Stephen Moore, Bindu Nanduri, Cedric Notredame, Yniv Palti, Graham S Plastow, James M Reecy, Gary A Rohrer, Elena Sarropoulou, Carl J Schmidt, Jeffrey Silverstein, Ross L Tellam, Michele Tixier-Boichard, Gwenola Tosser-Klopp, Christopher K Tuggle, Johanna Vilkki, Stephen N White, Shuhong Zhao, Huaijun Zhou |
| Abstract |
We describe the organization of a nascent international effort, the Functional Annotation of Animal Genomes (FAANG) project, whose aim is to produce comprehensive maps of functional elements in the genomes of domesticated animal species. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 26% |
| United States | 3 | 11% |
| France | 3 | 11% |
| Australia | 2 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 48% |
| Scientists | 13 | 48% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 203 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 55 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 12% |
| Professor | 9 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 29 | 14% |
| Unknown | 41 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 105 | 50% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 32 | 15% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 9 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 3% |
| Unknown | 48 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2017.
All research outputs
#2,130,300
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,788
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,906
of 277,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#28
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.