↓ Skip to main content

Interventions to increase the reporting of occupational diseases by physicians

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
31 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions to increase the reporting of occupational diseases by physicians
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010305.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefania Curti, Riitta Sauni, Dick Spreeuwers, Antoon De Schryver, Madeleine Valenty, Stéphanie Rivière, Stefano Mattioli

Abstract

Under-reporting of occupational diseases is an important issue worldwide. The collection of reliable data is essential for public health officials to plan intervention programmes to prevent occupational diseases. Little is known about the effects of interventions for increasing the reporting of occupational diseases.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 149 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 16%
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Other 13 9%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 24 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 29%
Psychology 26 17%
Social Sciences 14 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 4%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 27 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2015.
All research outputs
#958,207
of 16,351,544 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,597
of 11,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,982
of 226,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#71
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,351,544 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.