↓ Skip to main content

Interproximal wear versus incisors extraction to solve anterior lower crowding: A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interproximal wear versus incisors extraction to solve anterior lower crowding: A systematic review
Published in
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, February 2015
DOI 10.1590/2176-9451.20.1.066-073.oar
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natália Valli de Almeida, Giordani Santos Silveira, Daniele Masterson Tavares Pereira, Claudia Trindade Mattos, José Nelson Mucha

Abstract

To determine by means of a systematic review the best treatment, whether interproximal wear or incisor extraction, to correct anterior lower crowding in Class I patients in permanent dentition.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 73 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 24%
Student > Postgraduate 16 22%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 9 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 72%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Psychology 1 1%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2015.
All research outputs
#8,135,628
of 13,499,685 outputs
Outputs from Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
#68
of 223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,093
of 221,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,499,685 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them