You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Automata, Languages and Programming
|
---|---|
Published by |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2010
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-14165-2 |
ISBNs |
978-3-64-214164-5, 978-3-64-214165-2
|
Authors |
Samson Abramsky, Cyril Gavoille, Claude Kirchner, Friedhelm Meyer auf der Heide, Paul G. Spirakis |
Editors |
Abramsky, Samson, Gavoille, Cyril, Kirchner, Claude, Meyer auf der Heide, Friedhelm, Spirakis, Paul G. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 12 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 31% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 23% |
Professor | 2 | 15% |
Researcher | 2 | 15% |
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 12 | 92% |
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2012.
All research outputs
#5,843,730
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#1,924
of 8,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,342
of 163,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#28
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.