You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Human helminth therapy to treat inflammatory disorders- where do we stand?
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Immunology, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12865-015-0074-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Helena Helmby |
Abstract |
Parasitic helminths have evolved together with the mammalian immune system over many millennia and as such they have become remarkably efficient modulators in order to promote their own survival. Their ability to alter and/or suppress immune responses could be beneficial to the host by helping control excessive inflammatory responses and animal models and pre-clinical trials have all suggested a beneficial effect of helminth infections on inflammatory bowel conditions, MS, asthma and atopy. Thus, helminth therapy has been suggested as a possible treatment method for autoimmune and other inflammatory disorders in humans. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 18 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
India | 3 | 5% |
Canada | 3 | 5% |
France | 2 | 4% |
Finland | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Singapore | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 22 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 32 | 58% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 20% |
Scientists | 8 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 350 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 340 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 89 | 25% |
Student > Master | 57 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 13% |
Researcher | 36 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 4% |
Other | 46 | 13% |
Unknown | 62 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 17% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 55 | 16% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 54 | 15% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 15% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 3% |
Other | 43 | 12% |
Unknown | 75 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 108. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2024.
All research outputs
#397,683
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from BMC Immunology
#3
of 624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,520
of 278,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Immunology
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 624 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.