↓ Skip to main content

Human helminth therapy to treat inflammatory disorders- where do we stand?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Immunology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 624)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
55 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
350 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human helminth therapy to treat inflammatory disorders- where do we stand?
Published in
BMC Immunology, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12865-015-0074-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helena Helmby

Abstract

Parasitic helminths have evolved together with the mammalian immune system over many millennia and as such they have become remarkably efficient modulators in order to promote their own survival. Their ability to alter and/or suppress immune responses could be beneficial to the host by helping control excessive inflammatory responses and animal models and pre-clinical trials have all suggested a beneficial effect of helminth infections on inflammatory bowel conditions, MS, asthma and atopy. Thus, helminth therapy has been suggested as a possible treatment method for autoimmune and other inflammatory disorders in humans.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 350 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 340 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 89 25%
Student > Master 57 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 13%
Researcher 36 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 4%
Other 46 13%
Unknown 62 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 55 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 54 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 52 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 3%
Other 43 12%
Unknown 75 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 108. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2024.
All research outputs
#397,683
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from BMC Immunology
#3
of 624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,520
of 278,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Immunology
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 624 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.