↓ Skip to main content

Topical analgesia for acute otitis media

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Topical analgesia for acute otitis media
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005657.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruth Foxlee, Ann-Charlott Johansson, Jessika Wejfalk, Liz Dooley, Chris B Del Mar

Abstract

Acute otitis media (AOM) is a spontaneously remitting disease for which pain is the most distressing symptom. Antibiotics are now known to have less benefit than previously assumed.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Chile 1 1%
Ecuador 1 1%
Unknown 91 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 22%
Student > Master 15 16%
Student > Bachelor 15 16%
Other 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Other 24 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 54%
Unspecified 13 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Other 14 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,452,827
of 13,520,735 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,220
of 10,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,070
of 97,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,520,735 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,624 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.