↓ Skip to main content

Impact of physical activity on energy balance, food intake and choice in normal weight and obese children in the setting of acute social stress: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
233 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of physical activity on energy balance, food intake and choice in normal weight and obese children in the setting of acute social stress: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12887-015-0326-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antje Horsch, Marion Wobmann, Susi Kriemler, Simone Munsch, Sylvie Borloz, Alexandra Balz, Pedro Marques-Vidal, Ayala Borghini, Jardena J Puder

Abstract

Psychological stress negatively influences food intake and food choices, thereby contributing to the development of childhood obesity. Physical activity can also moderate eating behavior and influence calorie intake. However, it is unknown if acute physical activity influences food intake and overall energy balance after acute stress exposure in children. We therefore investigated the impact of acute physical activity on overall energy balance (food intake minus energy expenditure), food intake, and choice in the setting of acute social stress in normal weight (NW) and overweight/obese (OW/OB) children as well as the impact of psychological risk factors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 232 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 16%
Student > Bachelor 26 11%
Researcher 19 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 8%
Student > Postgraduate 13 6%
Other 44 19%
Unknown 74 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 16%
Psychology 28 12%
Sports and Recreations 16 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 4%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 75 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2016.
All research outputs
#7,912,071
of 24,505,736 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#1,442
of 3,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,555
of 259,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#9
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,505,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.