↓ Skip to main content

Deleterious effects of endocrine disruptors are corrected in the mammalian germline by epigenome reprogramming

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
30 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deleterious effects of endocrine disruptors are corrected in the mammalian germline by epigenome reprogramming
Published in
Genome Biology, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13059-015-0619-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Khursheed Iqbal, Diana A Tran, Arthur X Li, Charles Warden, Angela Y Bai, Purnima Singh, Xiwei Wu, Gerd P Pfeifer, Piroska E Szabó

Abstract

Exposure to environmental endocrine-disrupting chemicals during pregnancy reportedly causes transgenerationally inherited reproductive defects. We hypothesized that to affect the grandchild, endocrine-disrupting chemicals must alter the epigenome of the germ cells of the in utero-exposed G1 male fetus. Additionally, to affect the great-grandchild, the aberration must persist in the germ cells of the unexposed G2 grandchild. Here, we treat gestating female mice with vinclozolin, bisphenol A, or di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate during the time when global de novo DNA methylation and imprint establishment occurs in the germ cells of the G1 male fetus. We map genome-wide features in purified G1 and G2 prospermatogonia, in order to detect immediate and persistent epigenetic aberrations, respectively. We detect changes in transcription and methylation in the G1 germline immediately after endocrine-disrupting chemicals exposure, but changes do not persist into the G2 germline. Additional analysis of genomic imprints shows no persistent aberrations in DNA methylation at the differentially methylated regions of imprinted genes between the G1 and G2 prospermatogonia, or in the allele-specific transcription of imprinted genes between the G2 and G3 soma. Our results suggest that endocrine-disrupting chemicals exert direct epigenetic effects in exposed fetal germ cells, which are corrected by reprogramming events in the next generation. Avoiding transgenerational inheritance of environmentally-caused epigenetic aberrations may have played an evolutionary role in the development of dual waves of global epigenome reprogramming in mammals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Japan 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 145 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 26%
Researcher 27 18%
Student > Bachelor 21 14%
Student > Master 15 10%
Professor 7 5%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 21 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 6%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 32 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2018.
All research outputs
#2,139,632
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,785
of 4,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,754
of 278,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#29
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,498 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.