↓ Skip to main content

Retraction Note: Collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney: a clinicopathological study of five cases

Overview of attention for article published in Diagnostic Pathology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Retraction Note: Collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney: a clinicopathological study of five cases
Published in
Diagnostic Pathology, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13000-015-0239-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiangyang Wang, Jianwei Hao, Ruijin Zhou, Xiangsheng Zhang, Tianzhong Yan, Degang Ding, Lei Shan, Zhonghua Liu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 2 50%
Professor 1 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 1 25%
Social Sciences 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Design 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2015.
All research outputs
#13,430,633
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#349
of 1,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,669
of 263,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#23
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.