You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tear of peroneus longus in long distance runners due to enlarged peroneal tubercle
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2052-1847-6-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ezequiel Palmanovich, Lior Laver, Yaron S Brin, Iftach Hetsroni, Meir Nyska |
| Abstract |
Tear of the Peroneus longus in association with a prominent peroneal tubercle is rare. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 31% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Researcher | 1 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 46% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Psychology | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2015.
All research outputs
#14,806,069
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
#335
of 497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,394
of 306,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.