↓ Skip to main content

Performance of species occurrence estimators when basic assumptions are not met: a test using field data where true occupancy status is known

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Performance of species occurrence estimators when basic assumptions are not met: a test using field data where true occupancy status is known
Published in
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, March 2015
DOI 10.1111/2041-210x.12342
Authors

David A. W. Miller, Larissa L. Bailey, Evan H. Campbell Grant, Brett T. McClintock, Linda A. Weir, Theodore R. Simons

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 8%
Portugal 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 104 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 29%
Researcher 33 26%
Student > Master 19 15%
Other 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 17 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 77 61%
Environmental Science 38 30%
Unspecified 5 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 2 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2015.
All research outputs
#1,097,926
of 13,182,016 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#686
of 1,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,655
of 221,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#22
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,182,016 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.