↓ Skip to main content

Potential impact of stress activated retrotransposons on genome evolution in a marine diatom

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Potential impact of stress activated retrotransposons on genome evolution in a marine diatom
Published in
BMC Genomics, December 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-10-624
Pubmed ID
Authors

Florian Maumus, Andrew E Allen, Corinne Mhiri, Hanhua Hu, Kamel Jabbari, Assaf Vardi, Marie-Angèle Grandbastien, Chris Bowler

Abstract

Transposable elements (TEs) are mobile DNA sequences present in the genomes of most organisms. They have been extensively studied in animals, fungi, and plants, and have been shown to have important functions in genome dynamics and species evolution. Recent genomic data can now enlarge the identification and study of TEs to other branches of the eukaryotic tree of life. Diatoms, which belong to the heterokont group, are unicellular eukaryotic algae responsible for around 40% of marine primary productivity. The genomes of a centric diatom, Thalassiosira pseudonana, and a pennate diatom, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, that likely diverged around 90 Mya, have recently become available.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Brazil 3 2%
France 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 167 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 56 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 20%
Student > Master 20 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 5%
Student > Bachelor 9 5%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 25 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 105 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 13%
Environmental Science 9 5%
Computer Science 4 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 31 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,058,333
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#581
of 10,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,265
of 163,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#4
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,605 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.