You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Determinants of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgery, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1097/sla.0000000000002766 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hanna Sternby, Federico Bolado, Héctor J Canaval-Zuleta, Carlos Marra-López, Ana I Hernando-Alonso, Adolfo Del-Val-Antoñana, Guillermo García-Rayado, Robin Rivera-Irigoin, Francisco J Grau-García, Lluís Oms, Judith Millastre-Bocos, Isabel Pascual-Moreno, David Martínez-Ares, Juan A Rodríguez-Oballe, Antonio López-Serrano, María L Ruiz-Rebollo, Alejandro Viejo-Almanzor, Belén González-de-la-Higuera, Aitor Orive-Calzada, Ignacio Gómez-Anta, José Pamies-Guilabert, Fátima Fernández-Gutiérrez-Del-Álamo, Isabel Iranzo-González-Cruz, Mónica E Pérez-Muñante, María D Esteba, Ana Pardillos-Tomé, Pedro Zapater, Enrique de-Madaria |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 87 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 31 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Portugal | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Paraguay | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Grenada | 1 | 1% |
| Romania | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 35 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 23% |
| Scientists | 10 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 35 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 36 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2021.
All research outputs
#632,680
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgery
#298
of 9,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,106
of 360,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgery
#11
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,076 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.