You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pilot randomised controlled trial of protective socks against usual care to reduce skin tears in high risk people “STOPCUTS”: study protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40814-015-0005-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roy J Powell, Christopher J Hayward, Caroline L Snelgrove, Kathleen Polverino, Linda Park, Rohan Chauhan, Philip H Evans, Rachel Byford, Carolyn Charman, Christopher J W Foy, Andrew Kingsley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 15% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 22 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 9% |
| Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 24 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2016.
All research outputs
#14,272,319
of 23,316,003 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#639
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,709
of 265,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,316,003 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.