You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evidence, Theory and Context: Using intervention mapping to develop a worksite physical activity intervention
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, September 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-8-326 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rosemary RC McEachan, Rebecca J Lawton, Cath Jackson, Mark Conner, Jennifer Lunt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 3% |
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 270 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 44 | 15% |
| Researcher | 38 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 52 | 18% |
| Unknown | 54 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 19% |
| Psychology | 45 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 41 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 9% |
| Sports and Recreations | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 32 | 11% |
| Unknown | 67 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2018.
All research outputs
#14,220,809
of 22,797,621 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,329
of 14,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,253
of 87,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#35
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,797,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,855 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.