↓ Skip to main content

Gender specific patterns of age-related decline in aortic stiffness: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study including normal ranges

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gender specific patterns of age-related decline in aortic stiffness: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study including normal ranges
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12968-015-0126-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard M Nethononda, Adam J Lewandowski, Ross Stewart, Ilias Kylinterias, Polly Whitworth, Jane Francis, Paul Leeson, Hugh Watkins, Stefan Neubauer, Oliver J Rider

Abstract

Young females exhibit lower cardiovascular event rates that young men, a pattern which is lost, or even reversed with advancing age. As aortic stiffness is a powerful risk factor for cardiovascular events, a gender difference with advancing age could provide a plausible explanation for this pattern. 777 subjects (♀n = 408, ♂n = 369) across a wide range of age (21-85 years) underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance to assess aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) and, in addition, aortic distensibility at three levels; 1) ascending aorta (Ao) and 2) proximal descending aorta (PDA) at the level of the pulmonary artery and 3) the abdominal aorta (DDA). There was a strong negative correlation between increasing age and regional aortic distensibility (Ao♀R-0.84, ♂R-0.80, PDA♀R-0.82, ♂R-0.77, DDA♀R-0.80, ♂R-0.71 all p < 0.001) and a strong positive correlation with PWV, (♀R0.53, ♂R 0.63 both p < 0.001). Even after adjustment for mean arterial pressure, body mass index, heart rate, smoking and diabetes, females exhibited a steeper decrease in all distensibility measures in response to increasing age (Ao♀-1.3 vs ♂-1.1 mmHg-1, PDA ♀-1.2 vs ♂-1.0 mmHg, DDA ♀-1.8 vs ♂-1.4 mmHg-1 per 10 years increase in age all p < 0.001). No gender difference in PWV increase with age was observed (p = 0.11). Although advancing age is accompanied by increased aortic stiffness in both males and females, a significant sex difference in the rate of change exists, with females showing a steeper decline in aortic elasticity. As aortic stiffness is strongly related to cardiovascular events our observations may explain the increase in cardiovascular event rates that accompanies the menopausal age in women.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 87 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Other 6 7%
Student > Master 6 7%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 17 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 46%
Engineering 8 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Materials Science 2 2%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 24 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2015.
All research outputs
#20,064,197
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,160
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,467
of 269,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#27
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.