You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessment of regression-based methods to adjust for publication bias through a comprehensive simulation study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-9-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Santiago G Moreno, Alex J Sutton, AE Ades, Tom D Stanley, Keith R Abrams, Jaime L Peters, Nicola J Cooper |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 80% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 151 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 21% |
| Researcher | 26 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 20% |
| Unknown | 30 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 38 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 9% |
| Mathematics | 9 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 12% |
| Unknown | 39 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2018.
All research outputs
#2,162,988
of 23,517,535 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#318
of 2,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,951
of 173,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,517,535 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,076 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.