↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of regression-based methods to adjust for publication bias through a comprehensive simulation study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
186 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of regression-based methods to adjust for publication bias through a comprehensive simulation study
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-9-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Santiago G Moreno, Alex J Sutton, AE Ades, Tom D Stanley, Keith R Abrams, Jaime L Peters, Nicola J Cooper

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Unknown 90 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 22%
Researcher 21 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 12%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 30 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 27%
Unspecified 12 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 11%
Mathematics 6 6%
Other 15 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2018.
All research outputs
#822,276
of 12,406,609 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#111
of 1,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,630
of 219,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,406,609 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,099 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them