↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of regression-based methods to adjust for publication bias through a comprehensive simulation study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
272 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of regression-based methods to adjust for publication bias through a comprehensive simulation study
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-9-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Santiago G Moreno, Alex J Sutton, AE Ades, Tom D Stanley, Keith R Abrams, Jaime L Peters, Nicola J Cooper

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 144 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 22%
Researcher 25 16%
Student > Master 17 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 32 21%
Unknown 27 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 37 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 9%
Mathematics 8 5%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 36 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2018.
All research outputs
#1,523,402
of 17,368,632 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#247
of 1,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,970
of 231,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,368,632 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,610 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,440 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them