You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fatores associados aos comportamentos de risco à saúde entre adolescentes brasileiros: uma revisão integrativa*
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1980-220x2017020403304 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luciana Ramos de Moura, Lilian Machado Torres, Matilde Meire Miranda Cadete, Cristiane de Freitas Cunha |
| Abstract |
Identifying knowledge about factors associated with health risk behaviors among Brazilian adolescents. An integrative review of the literature conducted in the Cochrane, IBECS, LILACS, MEDLINE and SciELO databases in relation to risk behaviors recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Thirty-seven (37) studies were analyzed, with a predominance of risky sexual behavior, tobacco use and violent behavior. Advancing age favored unprotected sex, alcohol and tobacco use. Family and friends influence was related to smoking and alcoholism. Males were more involved in situations of violence and the female gender was associated with physical inactivity. Belonging to a lower economic class was related to unprotected sex, physical inactivity, unhealthy dietary behaviors and violence. Studying in private school was related to unhealthy dietary behavior. Risk behaviors were related to social, economic and family factors and they tend to agglomerate. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 60% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 39 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 43 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2018.
All research outputs
#15,745,807
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#192
of 773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,244
of 324,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 773 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.