↓ Skip to main content

De novo mutations of SETBP1 cause Schinzel-Giedion syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
360 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
337 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
De novo mutations of SETBP1 cause Schinzel-Giedion syndrome
Published in
Nature Genetics, May 2010
DOI 10.1038/ng.581
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander Hoischen, Bregje W M van Bon, Christian Gilissen, Peer Arts, Bart van Lier, Marloes Steehouwer, Petra de Vries, Rick de Reuver, Nienke Wieskamp, Geert Mortier, Koen Devriendt, Marta Z Amorim, Nicole Revencu, Alexa Kidd, Mafalda Barbosa, Anne Turner, Janine Smith, Christina Oley, Alex Henderson, Ian M Hayes, Elizabeth M Thompson, Han G Brunner, Bert B A de Vries, Joris A Veltman

Abstract

Schinzel-Giedion syndrome is characterized by severe mental retardation, distinctive facial features and multiple congenital malformations; most affected individuals die before the age of ten. We sequenced the exomes of four affected individuals (cases) and found heterozygous de novo variants in SETBP1 in all four. We also identified SETBP1 mutations in eight additional cases using Sanger sequencing. All mutations clustered to a highly conserved 11-bp exonic region, suggesting a dominant-negative or gain-of-function effect.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 337 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 10 3%
United States 5 1%
Netherlands 4 1%
Germany 3 <1%
Belgium 3 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 306 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 84 25%
Researcher 80 24%
Student > Master 39 12%
Student > Bachelor 30 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 19 6%
Other 69 20%
Unknown 16 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 138 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 79 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 58 17%
Computer Science 12 4%
Neuroscience 8 2%
Other 14 4%
Unknown 28 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,216,507
of 14,644,185 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#2,051
of 6,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,050
of 99,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#25
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,644,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.