↓ Skip to main content

The risk of cumulative radiation exposure in chest imaging and the advantage of bedside ultrasound

Overview of attention for article published in The Ultrasound Journal, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The risk of cumulative radiation exposure in chest imaging and the advantage of bedside ultrasound
Published in
The Ultrasound Journal, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13089-015-0020-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luna Gargani, Eugenio Picano

Abstract

The increasing use and complexity of imaging techniques have not been matched by increasing awareness and knowledge by prescribers and practitioners. Imaging examinations that expose to ionizing radiation provide immense benefits when appropriate, yet they may result in an increased incidence of radiation-induced cancer in the long-term. The radiation issue is relevant not only for the individual patient but also for the community because small individual risks multiplied by millions of examinations become a significant population risk. As recently highlighted by recent European and American Guidelines, the long-term risk associated with radiation exposure should be considered in the risk-benefit assessment behind appropriate prescription of diagnostic testing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Student > Postgraduate 10 11%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Other 20 23%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Physics and Astronomy 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 27 31%