↓ Skip to main content

Medical Professionalism: Conflicting Values for Tomorrow's Doctors

Overview of attention for article published in JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Medical Professionalism: Conflicting Values for Tomorrow's Doctors
Published in
JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, August 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11606-010-1485-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erica Borgstrom, Simon Cohn, Stephen Barclay

Abstract

New values and practices associated with medical professionalism have created an increased interest in the concept. In the United Kingdom, it is a current concern in medical education and in the development of doctor appraisal and revalidation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 132 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 13%
Researcher 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Master 13 9%
Other 45 33%
Unknown 12 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 48%
Social Sciences 21 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 4%
Psychology 5 4%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 17 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,940,907
of 16,578,007 outputs
Outputs from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2,784
of 5,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,316
of 106,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#24
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,578,007 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.