↓ Skip to main content

Medical Professionalism: Conflicting Values for Tomorrow's Doctors

Overview of attention for article published in JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Medical Professionalism: Conflicting Values for Tomorrow's Doctors
Published in
JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, August 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11606-010-1485-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erica Borgstrom, Simon Cohn, Stephen Barclay

Abstract

New values and practices associated with medical professionalism have created an increased interest in the concept. In the United Kingdom, it is a current concern in medical education and in the development of doctor appraisal and revalidation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Canada 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 106 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 18%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Postgraduate 10 9%
Other 43 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 53%
Social Sciences 18 16%
Unspecified 9 8%
Psychology 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 17 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2016.
All research outputs
#3,318,272
of 12,348,329 outputs
Outputs from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,832
of 4,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,764
of 96,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#22
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,348,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.