↓ Skip to main content

Dietary advice with or without oral nutritional supplements for disease‐related malnutrition in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dietary advice with or without oral nutritional supplements for disease‐related malnutrition in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002008.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Baldwin C, Weekes CE, Baldwin, Christine, Weekes, Christine Elizabeth

Abstract

Disease-related malnutrition has been reported in 10% to 55% of people in hospital and the community. Dietary advice encouraging the use of energy- and nutrient-rich foods rather than oral nutritional supplements has been suggested as the initial approach for managing disease-related malnutrition.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
India 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 150 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 19%
Student > Master 26 16%
Student > Bachelor 25 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 11%
Other 38 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Social Sciences 11 7%
Unspecified 8 5%
Other 29 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2015.
All research outputs
#1,890,294
of 8,096,639 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,418
of 8,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,221
of 81,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,096,639 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.