↓ Skip to main content

Dietary advice with or without oral nutritional supplements for disease-related malnutrition in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
345 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dietary advice with or without oral nutritional supplements for disease-related malnutrition in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002008.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine Baldwin, Christine Elizabeth Weekes

Abstract

Disease-related malnutrition has been reported in 10% to 55% of people in hospital and the community. Dietary advice encouraging the use of energy- and nutrient-rich foods rather than oral nutritional supplements has been suggested as the initial approach for managing disease-related malnutrition.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 345 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 334 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 66 19%
Student > Bachelor 63 18%
Researcher 40 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 11%
Student > Postgraduate 25 7%
Other 69 20%
Unknown 44 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 135 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 48 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 8%
Social Sciences 18 5%
Psychology 10 3%
Other 48 14%
Unknown 58 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2018.
All research outputs
#3,802,536
of 13,865,625 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,677
of 10,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,586
of 98,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,865,625 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.