You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The challenges and benefits of a genuine partnership between Music Therapy and Neuroscience: a dialog between scientist and therapist
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00223 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wendy L. Magee, Lauren Stewart |
| Abstract |
Collaborations between neuroscience and music therapy promise many mutual benefits given the different knowledge bases, experiences and specialist skills possessed by each discipline. Primarily, music therapists deliver music-based interventions on a daily basis with numerous populations; neuroscientists measure clinical changes in ways that provide an evidence base for progressing clinical care. Although recent developments suggest that partnerships between the two can produce positive outcomes for both fields, these collaborations are not considered mainstream. The following dialog between an experienced professional from each discipline explores the potential for collaboration, as well as the misconceptions that may be preventing further synergies from developing. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 17% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 9% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 70% |
| Scientists | 4 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 15% |
| Researcher | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 21 | 27% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 15% |
| Arts and Humanities | 9 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 13 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2016.
All research outputs
#1,643,762
of 24,079,335 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#789
of 7,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,238
of 268,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#47
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,079,335 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.