You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Future fish distributions constrained by depth in warming seas
Nature Climate Change, April 2015
Louise A. Rutterford, Stephen D. Simpson, Simon Jennings, Mark P. Johnson, Julia L. Blanchard, Pieter-Jan Schön, David W. Sims, Jonathan Tinker, Martin J. Genner
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||33||63%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||5||10%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 319 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||69||22%|
|Student > Bachelor||41||13%|
|Student > Master||35||11%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||142||45%|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||14||4%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||4||1%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 120. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2021.
All research outputs
of 24,378,498 outputs
Outputs from Nature Climate Change
of 4,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 268,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Climate Change
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,378,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 128.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.