Title |
Community clusters of tsunami vulnerability in the US Pacific Northwest
|
---|---|
Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2015
|
DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1420309112 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nathan J. Wood, Jeanne Jones, Seth Spielman, Mathew C. Schmidtlein |
Abstract |
Many coastal communities throughout the world are threatened by local (or near-field) tsunamis that could inundate low-lying areas in a matter of minutes after generation. Although the hazard and sustainability literature often frames vulnerability conceptually as a multidimensional issue involving exposure, sensitivity, and resilience to a hazard, assessments often focus on one element or do not recognize the hazard context. We introduce an analytical framework for describing variations in population vulnerability to tsunami hazards that integrates (i) geospatial approaches to identify the number and characteristics of people in hazard zones, (ii) anisotropic path distance models to estimate evacuation travel times to safety, and (iii) cluster analysis to classify communities with similar vulnerability. We demonstrate this approach by classifying 49 incorporated cities, 7 tribal reservations, and 17 counties from northern California to northern Washington that are directly threatened by tsunami waves associated with a Cascadia subduction zone earthquake. Results suggest three primary community groups: (i) relatively low numbers of exposed populations with varied demographic sensitivities, (ii) high numbers of exposed populations but sufficient time to evacuate before wave arrival, and (iii) moderate numbers of exposed populations but insufficient time to evacuate. Results can be used to enhance general hazard-awareness efforts with targeted interventions, such as education and outreach tailored to local demographics, evacuation training, and/or vertical evacuation refuges. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 36% |
Sweden | 1 | 9% |
Thailand | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 6 | 55% |
Members of the public | 4 | 36% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
New Zealand | 2 | 3% |
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
Cuba | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 66 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 27% |
Researcher | 12 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 14% |
Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
Other | 13 | 18% |
Unknown | 6 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 13 | 18% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 11% |
Engineering | 6 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
Other | 17 | 24% |
Unknown | 12 | 17% |